/* AURA D3.11C — Case Study card consistency + final mobile hierarchy
   Product Owner-approved direction: 14 Aug 2026.
   Scope only:
   - Public Case Study 02 title: Interview Process Standardisation.
   - Desktop: normalize the title/outcome zone so evidence visuals align more naturally.
   - Mobile: enforce one card anatomy across all three stories: visual/title/outcome → Skills → description → CTA.
   - All three library CTAs use “Explore case study”.
   - No other content, evidence, skill chips, imagery, route, privacy, or workstream changes. */

/* Desktop-only shared pre-image zone. The outcome remains directly beneath its own title;
   any extra room falls below the outcome instead of creating awkward internal gaps. */
@media(min-width:1051px){
  .case-library-card .case-card-heading{
    min-height:9rem;
    display:block;
  }
  .case-card-hmt .case-card-visual,
  .case-card-kickoff .case-card-visual{
    margin-top:0;
  }
}

/* Mobile cards use the same information order. Natural content height is preserved. */
@media(max-width:700px){
  .case-library-card{
    grid-template-areas:
      "visual top"
      "visual title"
      "visual outcome"
      "skills skills"
      "desc desc"
      "link link";
  }
  .case-card-heading{display:contents;}
  .case-card-skills{grid-area:skills;}
}